Skip to content

Comparison ยท Data enrichment and GTM workflow platform

FoxKnock vs Clay: a finished outbound loop or a table you build

FoxKnock vs Clay comes down to who builds the workflow: Clay is a flexible data workbench you assemble yourself, while FoxKnock is a finished outbound loop for small B2B teams and agencies.

Clay is built for people who build go-to-market systems. You work in tables, pull from a marketplace of 150+ data providers, add AI research with Claygent and send email through its Sequencer. It suits a team with someone who likes to build.

FoxKnock starts from your website and your best customers. It writes your playbook, finds lookalike companies, researches each one with cited sources, finds and verifies contacts, drafts outreach and sends from your own mailboxes after you approve it. You review each email by default, and automatic sending is opt-in and has to be earned.

FoxKnock launched in October 2026, so it is newer and narrower than Clay. This page compares the two as of 2026-10-17 and says where Clay is ahead.

Facts checked from public sources listed at the end. Tools change often, so check before you decide. Written by the FoxKnock team, so read it knowing who wrote it.

The short answer

If you want to design your own data and outreach workflows and you have someone to build and maintain them, Clay is the better fit: it is more flexible and has far more data sources, integrations and scale. If you want one tool that already runs the loop (research with sources, contacts, drafts you approve, replies sorted) and you would rather not assemble it, FoxKnock is built for that, at the cost of flexibility and data breadth. The two can also be used together.

Choose FoxKnock if

  • You want one product from your website to approved emails and sorted replies, without building tables or workflows first.
  • You want to read and approve every email before it sends. That is the default, and automatic sending has to be earned per sequence.
  • You want research where every fact shows its source, quote and date, so a person can click through before approving.
  • You want one meter (credits), the cost shown before you click the main paid actions, and a monthly spend cap you set.
  • You are a small team or agency without a dedicated GTM engineer or RevOps person.

Choose Clay if

  • You need the widest data coverage: 150+ providers, waterfalls, your own API keys (which skip data-credit charges in Clay) and custom data points from Claygent that no database sells.
  • You run Salesforce or a data warehouse, or need HTTP API calls, SSO and finer role permissions than FoxKnock's owner, admin and member roles. Clay has these on its higher plans. FoxKnock offers a one-way HubSpot push, a REST API and webhooks.
  • You have a GTM engineer or ops lead who wants to build custom plays and run them over tens of thousands of records.
  • You need mailbox warm-up or Google and Microsoft OAuth connections. FoxKnock connects Google Workspace or any SMTP and IMAP mail server with an app password, and Microsoft 365 is limited.
  • You need a vendor that lists SOC 2 and ISO 27001 on its pricing page. FoxKnock is not yet certified.

FoxKnock vs Clay, feature by feature

FoxKnock compared with Clay
Data sourcesFoxKnock
Partly: Fixed waterfalls over wired providers (your own keys work too); no database of its own
Clay
Yes: 150+ providers in one marketplace (its homepage says 200+), plus bring your own keys
Build your own workflowsFoxKnock
No: A fixed loop plus simple when-then plays; no table builder
Clay
Yes: Tables, waterfalls, custom functions, HTTP API (Growth and up)
Finished outbound loop in one productFoxKnock
Yes: Playbook, discovery, research, send and inbox, no assembly
Clay
Partly: Data and an email Sequencer exist; you assemble the flow
Research with a source on every factFoxKnock
Yes: Evidence cards: source URL, quote, date and expiry
Clay
Partly: Claygent returns sources if your prompt asks for them
Review each email before it sendsFoxKnock
Yes: Review each by default; auto-send has to be earned
Clay
Partly: Optional review step before the sequencer (approve, edit or skip); you set the automation level per audience
Buying signalsFoxKnock
Partly: Hiring, funding, news, tech change, custom; no job changes
Clay
Yes: Job changes, news, social listening on Launch and up; web intent on Growth
CRM and warehouse syncFoxKnock
Partly: One-way push to HubSpot; REST API and webhooks
Clay
Yes: CRM and data warehouse sync on Growth and up
Connecting Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 mailboxesFoxKnock
Partly: Google Workspace or any SMTP/IMAP server with an app password; Microsoft 365 is limited, with no Microsoft sign-in
Clay
Yes: Google and Microsoft OAuth, or SMTP/IMAP
Mailbox warm-upFoxKnock
No: Send-volume ramp and caps only; no warm-up network
Clay
Yes: Warm-up included, on by default for inboxes bought in Clay
Unused creditsFoxKnock
Yes: One credit meter; credits roll over every month
Clay
Partly: Actions reset monthly; data credits roll over to a cap
Security certifications and SSOFoxKnock
No: Not yet certified; no SSO or customer 2FA today
Clay
Yes: SOC 2 and ISO 27001 listed on its pricing page; SSO on Enterprise
Reading and sorting repliesFoxKnock
Yes: AI inbox sorts replies into 13 classes with a confidence score
Clay
Yes: Replies get a category (Interested, Meeting Request, Out Of Office and more) in a workspace Inbox; Slack approval for drafted replies

Pricing compared

FoxKnock

  • FreeFree, 500 credits once
  • Starter$49/mo, 5,000 credits
  • Growth$149/mo, 20,000 credits
  • Agency$399/mo, 60,000 credits
  • EnterpriseCustom

One meter for everything: credits at $0.01 that never expire. Failed lookups are free, bounced verified emails are refunded, and you can set a monthly cap.

FoxKnock uses one meter instead of two: credits, at 1 credit = $0.01 at list price. Failed lookups are free and credits roll over every month. The credit price of each action can change, so check the credit table on the pricing page before you budget.

Full pricing and cost calculator

Clay

Checked on 2026-10-17 against Clay's pricing page. Clay sells two meters: actions (platform work: about one per enrichment and one per record sent to another tool, while a CSV export uses none, per its docs) and data credits (what data and AI cost from its marketplace).

PlanPrice per monthIncluded each monthWhat it adds
Free$0500 actions, 100 data creditsUp to 200 rows per table, waterfalls, Claygent, bring your own keys
LaunchFrom $167 billed annually, $185 billed monthlyFrom 15,000 actions and about 2,500 data creditsPhone enrichment, signals, Audiences search, email campaigns, up to 50,000 rows per table
GrowthFrom $446 billed annually, $495 billed monthlyFrom 40,000 actions and 6,000 data creditsCRM and warehouse sync, HTTP API, webhooks, web intent signals, ad audiences, buying domains and mailboxes for its Sequencer, priority support
EnterpriseCustom, annual commitmentCustomSSO, role-based access, custom data processing agreement, dedicated growth strategist

"From" means the starting tier: you can buy more actions or data credits and the price rises. Four rules change the bill:

  • Unit prices. Per Clay's pricing page and docs, actions start at less than $0.01 each and data credits at $0.05 each, and top-ups carry a 30% premium.
  • Rollover. Unused actions never roll over. Data credits roll over on monthly plans up to twice the monthly amount, and annual plans roll over 15% if you renew at the same or a higher tier (Clay's rollover FAQ and its Actions and Data Credits docs).
  • Failed lookups. An enrichment that returns no result is not charged.
  • Timing. Clay's new plans and units took effect on March 11, 2026 (existing customers stay on their current plans by default, per its announcement), so older third-party articles may quote different numbers.

Where Clay is ahead of FoxKnock

Clay is the broader and more flexible product in most of the areas below, and it is worth saying so plainly.

Data breadth. Clay's pricing plan table describes enrichment from 150+ providers, with waterfalls that try one provider after another. Its homepage and site menu say 200+, so Clay's own pages disagree on the count. You can connect your own API keys for providers you already pay, which removes the data-credit cost (each run still uses an action).

FoxKnock also accepts your own provider keys, but it charges credits the same either way. It owns no database. It runs fixed waterfalls over a smaller set of providers and the open web, so its coverage is narrower by design.

Flexibility. Everything in Clay is a table you control. You can add a column for any question, run Claygent (Clay's AI research agent) against every row, write formulas, reuse logic as functions and call any HTTP API on Growth. Claygent can return the source URL it read, but Clay's own guide treats that as something you ask for in the prompt.

FoxKnock's research has one shape (quick, standard or deep) that you cannot reprogram.

Integrations and scale. Clay's Audiences import from Salesforce, HubSpot, Snowflake, BigQuery and Databricks, and write enriched data back to Salesforce. Per its Audiences docs, CRM and warehouse sync starts on Growth (up to 250,000 records) and goes to 25 million on Enterprise, while Launch imports from Clay's database and CSV.

FoxKnock pushes one way to HubSpot, offers a REST API and webhooks, and imports CSV files of up to 5,000 rows.

Sending infrastructure. Clay's Sequencer connects Google and Microsoft mailboxes through OAuth, includes warm-up (it runs on Smartlead, per its docs; managed for you on inboxes bought in Clay, opt-in on ones you connect), and on Growth can buy domains and mailboxes for you.

FoxKnock has a send-volume ramp but no warm-up network. It connects Google Workspace or any SMTP and IMAP mail server with an app password. Microsoft 365 is limited: Microsoft no longer accepts passwords (Basic authentication) for IMAP in Exchange Online and is retiring it for SMTP AUTH, so a Microsoft 365 mailbox may not connect or may not sync replies, and FoxKnock does not offer Microsoft sign-in.

Maturity and security. Clay lists SOC 2 and ISO 27001 on its pricing page and offers SSO and role-based access control on Enterprise. FoxKnock launched in October 2026, is not yet certified, and has no SSO or two-factor sign-in for customers today.

FoxKnock as a Clay alternative for small teams

With Clay you build the parts. FoxKnock has already assembled them, so a small team has nothing to wire together before it starts. The loop runs in this order:

  1. Playbook. FoxKnock reads your website and a few best customers, then writes a playbook and proposes segments.
  2. Discovery. It finds companies four ways: describe them in plain language, find lookalike companies, search local businesses, or find people at companies you choose. Results are staged, and you pay (15 credits each at default prices) only for the ones you accept.
  3. Research. Each company can be researched into evidence cards: a one-sentence claim, a source URL, a verbatim quote and a date. Cards expire after 90 days for news, hiring and funding and a year for the rest. See AI prospect research.
  4. Drafts. Email drafts must tie each specific claim to a card, and a claim checker blocks drafts with unsupported ones. Templates you write yourself are not claim-checked, and the checker is AI, not infallible, which is one reason review each is the default.
  5. Approval. The default is a queue where you review each email. Automatic sending is opt-in per sequence and becomes available only after at least 50 emails approved one by one, with under 10% edited and under 5% rejected. Even then it approves by rule, never by a timer. Separately, an opt-in booking-link reply to meeting requests can go out without per-message approval. Details are on the approval-first outreach page.
  6. Sending and replies. Mail goes out from your own mailboxes under daily caps (25 a day per mailbox by default, 50 at most) and, by default, in the recipient's working hours, with one-click unsubscribe. Replies land in an inbox that sorts them into 13 classes.

Clay can add a person to the loop too. Its University lesson on AI outbound describes a review step where a rep can approve, edit or skip each message before the sequencer handoff, and its Sequencer posts drafted replies to Slack for approval. In Clay this is something you set up and can drop per audience. In FoxKnock it is the default.

Two smaller differences. FoxKnock includes built-in GDPR tools (country rule packs, lawful-basis confirmation, suppression lists, retention, access export and erasure), though compliance stays the sender's responsibility. And Clay's Sequencer is email only, per its docs, while FoxKnock sequences can also include LinkedIn, call and manual tasks, which you carry out by hand.

You can build a version of this in Clay. The difference is who builds it and who keeps it working. If you are weighing more than two tools, see Clay alternatives.

Clay pricing vs FoxKnock credits: a worked month

This is an illustration with a hypothetical agency, not a benchmark. A 2-person agency wants to reach 70 new accounts in a month: one contact per account, a verified work email, and a first email each.

FoxKnock, at default credit prices (they can change, so see pricing):

StepCredits per account
Accept a discovery result15
Standard research report225
Find one contact5
Find an email10
Verify it1
AI-personalized first email20
Total276

Seventy accounts at 276 credits is 19,320 credits, inside the Growth plan's 20,000 credits ($149 a month). Failed lookups are free, so real spend may be lower. Skip the research reports and use template emails, and each account costs 31 credits: 2,170 credits for the month, inside Starter's 5,000 ($49 a month).

Clay. On units, Launch covers this volume. It costs $167 a month billed annually or $185 billed monthly.

  • Data credits. Clay's docs say a fully enriched record typically costs 6 to 20 data credits, so 70 contacts use roughly 420 to 1,400 of Launch's 2,500 monthly data credits.
  • Actions. If each row runs ten enrichment steps, that is about 700 of its 15,000 actions (one action per enrichment), plus 70 more if you send through its Sequencer (one per lead added to a campaign).
  • Claygent research. It adds data credits that vary by the model you pick, so there is no fixed number for that step.

Two honest readings.

Clay can be cheaper per lookup. In the example in Clay's own docs, an email lookup is 0.5 data credits, about 2.5 cents at the $0.05 starting price (our arithmetic, plus one action), against 11 credits (11 cents at list price) for a verified email at FoxKnock's default prices. Clay's docs say data credit costs run from 0.5 to 10 or more depending on the data type, so this is one of its cheaper steps. If all you need is data and you have time to build, Clay's unit costs are lower.

Units are not the whole cost. With Clay you build and maintain the workflow yourself, which is time this example does not price, and its docs advise filtering first and testing on 10 to 20 records before scaling so credits are not wasted on failed experiments. For how Clay's two meters work, see Clay credits explained.

Switching from Clay to FoxKnock

Moving a list is simple. Moving a workflow is not, because FoxKnock does not import Clay tables, formulas or Claygent prompts.

  1. Export your records. In Clay, open the Tools menu, choose Export and download the CSV. Clay's docs say a CSV export does not use an action or data credits.
  2. Import to FoxKnock. CSV import takes up to 5,000 rows at a time and maps columns automatically (email, names, title, LinkedIn URL, phone, country, city, tags, company, domain). Split larger files.
  3. Fill in the country column. FoxKnock's country rules block contacts with an unknown country while a rule that requires a lawful basis is active, until you set a country or a lawful basis.
  4. Bring your do-not-contact list. Import it into FoxKnock's suppression list, which accepts CSV.
  5. Rebuild the inputs. Give FoxKnock your website and paste your best customers' domains (1 to 10) as lookalike seeds, instead of recreating a table.
  6. Reconnect mailboxes. Google Workspace or any SMTP and IMAP mail server connects with an app password. If your Clay mailboxes are on Microsoft 365, expect a limit: Microsoft no longer accepts passwords for IMAP in Exchange Online and is retiring them for SMTP AUTH, so the mailbox may not connect or may not sync replies, and FoxKnock does not offer Microsoft sign-in. Fix any SPF, DKIM or DMARC gaps the DNS check shows. Sending starts on FoxKnock's ramp, which begins at 8 a day by default.

Addresses you import are not charged email-find credits. FoxKnock re-verifies an address before sending when the last check is older than 14 days, at 1 credit.

Using Clay and FoxKnock together

You can, though there is no packaged Clay connector. The two routes are CSV and the REST API: FoxKnock's API keys are a Growth-plan feature, and Clay's HTTP API integrations are on its Growth plan.

A sensible split is to let Clay do what it does best, sourcing and custom enrichment, and send the accounts you want to pursue into FoxKnock for cited research, drafts, your approval and sending. Watch for paying twice for the same data, and keep country and lawful-basis fields filled in.

Try it on your own market

The fairest test is your own market, so sign up free, use the 500 free credits (no card needed) to run discovery and research on a few accounts, and judge the cited research and drafts for yourself.

Frequently asked questions

Is FoxKnock a good Clay alternative for small teams?

Yes, if you want one tool that researches accounts, finds contacts, drafts emails you approve and sorts replies, without building tables first. No, if you need custom data workflows, Salesforce or warehouse sync, or the widest data coverage: Clay is the better fit there and FoxKnock is not a replacement. Our Clay alternatives page covers other options.

Is FoxKnock cheaper than Clay?

Its paid plans start lower, but Clay can cost less per lookup. FoxKnock plans start at $0 (500 one-time credits), then $49, $149 and $399 a month. Clay's Launch starts at $167 a month billed annually ($185 monthly) and Growth at $446 annually ($495 monthly). Clay's docs show an email lookup at 0.5 data credits, while FoxKnock costs more where it does more, such as a cited research report per account. See the worked example on this page and the credit table on the pricing page.

How much does Clay cost in 2026?

Clay's Free plan is $0, Launch starts at $167 a month billed annually or $185 billed monthly, and Growth at $446 annually or $495 monthly. Enterprise is custom. Free includes 500 actions and 100 data credits a month (per its pricing page, checked 2026-10-17). Clay bills two meters, actions and data credits, and you can buy more of either, so the final price depends on your volume.

Does FoxKnock have a contact database like Clay?

No. FoxKnock does not own a contact database. It finds companies through web search, company-data providers and your own CRM, then looks for people and work emails through provider waterfalls and the company's own website. Coverage depends on what those sources return. Clay offers a marketplace of 150+ data providers and a people and companies search in Audiences, so its data breadth is much larger.

Do Clay credits roll over?

Partly. Per Clay's FAQ, actions reset every billing cycle and never roll over. Data credits do roll over: on monthly plans you can bank up to twice your monthly amount, and annual plans roll over 15% when you renew at the same or a higher tier (Clay's docs say 15% of unused credits, its pricing table says 15% of annual credits). FoxKnock has one meter, credits, and they roll over every month.

How do I switch from Clay to FoxKnock?

Export your Clay table as a CSV (Clay's docs say an export uses no actions or data credits) and import it into FoxKnock, up to 5,000 rows at a time. FoxKnock does not import Clay tables, formulas or Claygent prompts, so you rebuild the inputs: your website and 1 to 10 best-customer domains as lookalike seeds. Fill in the country column so the country rules do not block contacts.

Can I use FoxKnock and Clay together?

Yes, but there is no packaged connector. Export a Clay table as CSV and import it into FoxKnock (up to 5,000 rows per import), or post records to FoxKnock's REST API. Clay can handle sourcing and custom enrichment, and FoxKnock can research, draft, wait for your approval and send. Avoid paying for the same data twice, and keep country and lawful-basis fields filled in.

Can I connect Microsoft 365 or Outlook mailboxes to FoxKnock?

Not reliably. FoxKnock connects mailboxes only with a password over SMTP and IMAP, and Microsoft no longer accepts passwords (Basic authentication) for IMAP in Exchange Online and is retiring it for SMTP AUTH. A Microsoft 365 mailbox may therefore not connect or may not sync replies, and FoxKnock does not offer Microsoft sign-in. Google Workspace or any SMTP and IMAP mail server, connected with an app password, is the supported route. Clay connects Google and Microsoft mailboxes through OAuth.

Sources

  1. Clay pricing page (plans, units, features, certifications, rollover table) (checked 17 October 2026)
  2. Clay FAQ: do unused data credits or actions roll over? (checked 17 October 2026)
  3. Clay docs: Actions and Data Credits (checked 17 October 2026)
  4. Clay blog: Introducing Clay's new pricing (effective March 11, 2026) (checked 17 October 2026)
  5. Clay docs: Sequencer FAQs and best practices (checked 17 October 2026)
  6. Clay docs: Table-based campaigns (mailboxes, warm-up, sending) (checked 17 October 2026)
  7. Clay guide: How to use Claygent for prospect research (checked 17 October 2026)
  8. Clay docs: Audiences (sources, CRM sync, write-back) (checked 17 October 2026)
  9. Clay University: exporting lists as CSV (checked 17 October 2026)
  10. Clay homepage (marketplace size claim) (checked 17 October 2026)
  11. Clay University: Use Case 4, AI outbound (review step before the sequencer) (checked 17 October 2026)
  12. Clay docs: Automate campaign events (reply categories, Slack approval for replies) (checked 17 October 2026)

See what FoxKnock finds for you

Start with 500 free credits. No card, no call, and every email waits for your approval by default.